I LOVE comments. Please leave some even if they are brief half-formed ideas
that you aren't even sure you really believe. I just love comments.

Monday, January 31, 2011

Which came first: the Just Act or the Just Person

I've enjoyed a nice FB conversation spawned by the following status update.

Does one become a just person by doing acts of justice, or is doing acts of justice the product of being a just person?


First off, clearly both are required. If an wicked person accidently did something that had a beneficial effect, I wouldn't call it a virtuous act. (Or shoud I?) Nonetheless, I think which causes which is important in deciding how to instill values. E.g., if you are going to work at a soup kitchen and your kid doesn't want to go, should you make him? If behaving in a virtuous manner, makes us virtuous, then the answer is yes. If truly virtuous acts require a virtuous heart first, then making him go is no good, and maybe even counterproductive.

2 comments:

Matt Dick said...

I'm sure it's a complex relationship with feedback loops involved. In other words, you make your kid go, because the relationship between the act and the person is a two-way street.

Plus, and irrelevant to the thought experiment, if you make them serve soup, then a hungry person gets soup, so there's a good result regardless.

vesiou

JimII said...

I think that a feedback loop is a great way to think of it.