I LOVE comments. Please leave some even if they are brief half-formed ideas
that you aren't even sure you really believe. I just love comments.

Friday, March 27, 2009

So right and so wrong

I heard about the Quiver Full movement on NPR the other day. These folks believe that the Bible calls them to have large families and that these large families will help spread God's word because they will allow us to outnumber the enemies of God's word.

They focus a lot on Psalm 127:3-5 which says,
3 Sons are a heritage from the LORD,
children a reward from him.
4 Like arrows in the hands of a warrior
are sons born in one's youth.
5 Blessed is the man
whose quiver is full of them.
They will not be put to shame
when they contend with their enemies in the gate.
Biblegateway Link. I provide the Biblegateway link in case you want to read the whole Psalm, or those around it.

I think these folks have nailed the intention of the Psalmist. Furthermore, the idea of having lots of children to make your nation strong is throughout the Bible. So, while this scripture may give them a good slogan, there is really much support for the idea.

Here's where I think they are wrong. First, this was the conventional wisdom of the day. It is not unique to find this in the bible. Unlike scriptures calling for mercy and restraint in a vicious time, see e.g. taking only a eye if someone takes your eye, or scriptures calling for kindness to the poor, scriptures encouraging big families are not a product of the unique something that I believe keeps the Bible relevant. Second, having large families is destructive to our planet and not at all helpful to our nation. Educated children, that makes our nation strong, not lots of children. So, I think they are wrong because they are focusing on an unimportant accidental message contained in the Bible.

It is wrong to say these people are misreading the Bible. The Bible encourages big families, patriarchal relationships in which the wife or wives are obedient to their husband, and unity of religion and government. But those reflections of the culture in which it was written are just not important. Am I cherry picking? Sure. But it isn't that I'm just taking the things that already conform to my values (I hope) I'm taking the more profound spiritual lessons.

UPDATE: Re-reading my post I came across to strong in opposition to big families. I think if people are fulfilled by big families, if they love and enjoy them, big families are great. I feel this exactly as strongly as I feel that it is a blessing that couples can feel free today not to have any children. I should have said, that a policy to encourage larger families than people would have otherwise is destructive to our planet and does not help make our nation strong.

1 comment:

Luke said...

I so appreciate your approach to the bible, Jim. I find that I can't do anything but "cherry pick" and that frightens me to some degree. What if I'm missing something? What if those things that I struggle with and then interpret as a cultural artifact of the time really are spiritual commandments? What I come back to is that it is clearly a given that I will screw some of it up and that I'll do my best and know that there is always grace to compensate for what I get wrong.