In his faith footnote, the pastor quotes Ambassador Peck as agreeing with Malcom X, that "America's chickens are coming home to roost" on September 11, 2001. He goes on to say:
We took this country, by terror, away from the Sioux, the Apache, the Arrowak (phonetic) the Comanche, the Arapajo, the Navajo. Terrorism--we took Africans from their country to build our way of ease and kept them enslaved and living in fear. Terrorism. We bombed Grenada and killed innocent civilians -- babies, non-military personnel. We bombed the black civilian community of Panama with Stealth Bombers and killed unarmed teenagers, and toddlers, pregnant mothers and hard working father. [fullest voice] We bombed Khadafi, his home and killed his child. Blessed be they who bash your children's head agains the rocks.First, let us distinguish this comment from that of Falwell & Robertson, who said 9/11 happened because of our permissive society. One of the problems with those statements is that they are nonsense, like saying the terrorist attacked us because they hate our freedom. Also, Falwell and Robertson were saying that God allowed the attacks, or caused the attacks, or some other divine intervention way of looking at the world. Wright's reference to historical events does not suggest that to me. He doesn't say we've been sinful in our policies, but that they amount to terror.
[fullest voice] We bombed Iraq, we killed unarmed civilians trying to make a living. We bombed the plant in Sudan to payback for the attack on our embassy -- killed hundreds of hard working people --mothers and fathers, who left home to go that day, not knowing they'd never get back home. [Even fuller voice] We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon and we never batted an eye. Kids playing in the playground, mothers picking up children after school -- civilians not soldiers. People just trying to make it day by day. We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and South Africa and now we are indignant? Because the stuff we have done overseas is brought back into our own front yard.
America's chickens are coming home, to roost. Violence begets violence. Hatred begets hatred, and terrorism begets terrorism
So, let's substitute a different sentiment, one in which the causation is similarly plausible. Let's say a socially conservative preacher claimed that the domestic terrorist who bombed abortion clinics did so because the murdering of the abortionists would come back on them. Or let's say a politically libertarian preacher said that the federal building bombers did so because the federal government's repression was held up by implicit violence and that threat was coming back on it. What is wrong with such statements?
I believe it is true that our methods of taking this country from the native people, was wicked and immoral. I believe enslaving Blacks in this country was wick and immoral. I believe we've used our militarily unnecessarily. But, why label American military violence as "terrorism"? Much of the violence he lists is distinctly not the asymmetric warfare that we think of as terrorism. There can be no purpose but to equate those actions with the acts of Al Quaeda on 9/11. That is, to say that the former not only causes the latter, but that the former justifies the latter.
I much preferred the sentiments I heard from my ministers. That is, before we do anything, we need to ask ourselves, "Why do they hate us so much?" Recognize that we have some control over the situation, without justifying the acts of violence from our enemies.