I LOVE comments. Please leave some even if they are brief half-formed ideas
that you aren't even sure you really believe. I just love comments.

Thursday, June 22, 2017


So, to enhance my sense of ennui while reading Ecclesiastes, my first draft of this post did not save.  Meaningless, meaningless, all is meaningless, I suppose.

Like Job, Ecclesiastes contains a distinctly counterculture theme.  Also like Job, it in no ways advocates abandoning God.  To the contrary, Ecclesiastes is very pro-establishment.  Chapter 5 begins, "Guard your steps when you go to the house of God. Go near to listen rather than to offer the sacrifice of fools, who do not know that they do wrong."  Chapter 8's second verse is, "Obey the king’s command, I say, because you took an oath before God."

Still, the author isn't happy about it.  Famously so.  Consider how quotable it is.
  • “Meaningless! Meaningless!” says the Teacher. “Utterly meaningless! Everything is meaningless.”
  • The sun rises and the sun sets,
  • chasing after the wind.
And who can forget
There is a time for everything,
and a season for every activity under the heavens:
2 a time to be born and a time to die,
a time to plant and a time to uproot,
3 a time to kill and a time to heal,
a time to tear down and a time to build,
4 a time to weep and a time to laugh,
a time to mourn and a time to dance,
5 a time to scatter stones and a time to gather them,
a time to embrace and a time to refrain from embracing,
6 a time to search and a time to give up,
a time to keep and a time to throw away,
7 a time to tear and a time to mend,
a time to be silent and a time to speak,
8 a time to love and a time to hate, a time for war and a time for peace.
Less quoted is the advice to diversify your investments.  Literally.

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Monday, June 19, 2017

Proverbs 27-29

The sayings continue.  The pragmatism continues.  Don't have a hot temper.  Discipline your children (and servants, ick).  But there is a decent amount of class warfare.  There are a total of 82 verses, at least 8 of them deal with the poor. 

Proverbs 28
3 A ruler who oppresses the poor
is like a driving rain that leaves no crops.
6 Better the poor whose walk is blameless
than the rich whose ways are perverse.
8 Whoever increases wealth by taking interest or profit from the poor
amasses it for another, who will be kind to the poor.
11 The rich are wise in their own eyes;
one who is poor and discerning sees how deluded they are.
27 Those who give to the poor will lack nothing,
but those who close their eyes to them receive many curses.
Proverbs 29
7 The righteous care about justice for the poor,
but the wicked have no such concern.
13 The poor and the oppressor have this in common:
The Lord gives sight to the eyes of both.
14 If a king judges the poor with fairness,
his throne will be established forever.
It is fascinating how much of the Old Testament is devoted to taking care of the poor. It's like when I read the Gospel of Mark recently and was like, "You know, what seem to be pretty literal healing stories are just a huge part of this Gospel."  Even as someone who is uncomfortable with miracles, you just can't deny that is a part of the story.  I am not sure how people read these texts and continue to be okay with a government that harms the poor.  Weird.

Sunday, June 18, 2017

Proverbs 25-26

So these proverbs were collected by Hezekiah's scribes, but they are still attributed to Solomon. Cool.

Here's some translation fun.  In English, "Like apples of gold in settings of silver is a ruling rightly given."  The footnote says that maybe it is an apple.  The Spanish, "Como naranjas de oro con incrustaciones de plata son las palabras dichas a tiempo."  So, Proverbs 25:11 refers to an apple, or maybe an apricot, or an orange.  Mkay.

Two proverbs warn that if you eat to much honey, it will make you vomit.  And one proverb provides that it is better to live in a corner of your roof than with a bitchy wife.

So there's that.

Saturday, June 17, 2017

1 Kings 9; 2 Chronicles 8

This is a complete side by side story.  Again, Kings is longer.  But also, God appears to Solomon in Kings, no explicitly in a dream this time, but it is implied, and makes a covenant with Solomon that his line will stay in power unless they fall out of line and fail to keep the commandments.  This is much more of a contract.

The two sources disagree about the role the Pharaoh's daughter played in some land to the South.  First From Kings.

15 Here is the account of the forced labor King Solomon conscripted to build the Lord’s temple, his own palace, the terraces,[f] the wall of Jerusalem, and Hazor, Megiddo and Gezer. 16 (Pharaoh king of Egypt had attacked and captured Gezer. He had set it on fire. He killed its Canaanite inhabitants and then gave it as a wedding gift to his daughter, Solomon’s wife. 17 And Solomon rebuilt Gezer.) He built up Lower Beth Horon, 18 Baalath, and Tadmor[g] in the desert, within his land, 19 as well as all his store cities and the towns for his chariots and for his horses[h]—whatever he desired to build in Jerusalem, in Lebanon and throughout all the territory he ruled.

. . .

After Pharaoh’s daughter had come up from the City of David to the palace Solomon had built for her, he constructed the terraces.
She's pretty important here.  Solomon is getting a nice bit of territory as a gift to her, right?  The Chronicler has a different view.  
Solomon then went to Hamath Zobah and captured it. 4 He also built up Tadmor in the desert and all the store cities he had built in Hamath. 5 He rebuilt Upper Beth Horon and Lower Beth Horon as fortified cities, with walls and with gates and bars, 6 as well as Baalath and all his store cities, and all the cities for his chariots and for his horses[b]—whatever he desired to build in Jerusalem, in Lebanon and throughout all the territory he ruled.
. . .

Solomon brought Pharaoh’s daughter up from the City of David to the palace he had built for her, for he said, “My wife must not live in the palace of David king of Israel, because the places the ark of the Lord has entered are holy.”
Not only does her pop lose credit for conquering and gifting some land to her, the moving her into her own palace is made to be explicitly due to her unworthiness as a foreigner, I presume.  Also, this passage makes clear that Solomon only enslaved foreigners.  Hmm.  So we won't look here for Biblical guidance on immigration policy.

Psalm 134, 146-150

This passage is of uplifting psalms of praise.  They focus on how God is the God for everyone.  As I have mentioned elsewhere, this notion is not found in all parts of Scripture.

Here is Psalm 148's cosmic, space-time take on the subject.
Praise the Lord from the heavens;
praise him in the heights above.

Praise him, all his angels;
praise him, all his heavenly hosts.
Praise him, sun and moon;
praise him, all you shining stars.
Praise him, you highest heavens
and you waters above the skies.

Let them praise the name of the Lord,
for at his command they were created,
and he established them for ever and ever—
he issued a decree that will never pass away
Ours is a big god, okay.  

There is lots of use of "Zion" in this passage, psalm 147 includes, "The Lord builds up Jerusalem;
he gathers the exiles of Israel."  Which raises a question for the creators of the reading list.  This psalm--and according to the NIB Commentary all of Book V--reflects a post-exile sentiment.  So, why am I reading it in the middle of King Solomon's reign?

Thursday, June 15, 2017

1 Kings 8; 2 Chronicles 5-7; Psalm 136

The reading plan split Kings' & Chronicles' description of Solomon's moving the arc of the covenant to the Temple and blessing the Temple  into two days.  So, I waited until today to blog about them.

Solomon really is the greatest King of Israel.  He unifies the territory from Gaza to the Euphrates.  He unifies power by defeating the various people who had believed themselves to be heir to the throne.  And in this passage, he seems to finally bring the mystical power of the ancient religion under civil authority.

Recall that the prophets opposed the creation of a king, and at first God opposes the building of a temple.  Even after David had built a palace.  Nonetheless, by the end, God acquiesces and comes into the Temple, as indicated by a dark cloud so thick that the priests cannot complete their rituals.  And Solomon, the king, no any prophet or priest dedicates the Temple.

It really is a magnificent story of unification.  Of course, like Camelot, it will be a relatively brief moment.

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

1 Kings 7; 2 Chronicles 4

We have two stories of dressing up the temple. Once again, we see tremendous similarity between the two passages. And, it seems plain to me that Chronicles is referencing Kings. 

So Huram finished all the work he had undertaken for King Solomon in the temple of the Lord:
41 the two pillars;
the two bowl-shaped capitals on top of the pillars;
the two sets of network decorating the two bowl-shaped capitals on top of the pillars;
42 the four hundred pomegranates for the two sets of network (two rows of pomegranates for each network decorating the bowl-shaped capitals on top of the pillars);
43 the ten stands with their ten basins;
44 the Sea and the twelve bulls under it;
45 the pots, shovels and sprinkling bowls.
All these objects that Huram made for King Solomon for the temple of the Lord were of burnished bronze.

The above is from Kings, the below from Chronicles.
So Huram finished the work he had undertaken for King Solomon in the temple of God:
12 the two pillars;
the two bowl-shaped capitals on top of the pillars;
the two sets of network decorating the two bowl-shaped capitals on top of the pillars;
13 the four hundred pomegranates for the two sets of network (two rows of pomegranates for each network, decorating the bowl-shaped capitals on top of the pillars);
14 the stands with their basins;
15 the Sea and the twelve bulls under it;
16 the pots, shovels, meat forks and all related articles.
All the objects that Huram-Abi made for King Solomon for the temple of the Lord were of polished bronze.

Pretty close.  It is interesting because there are differences between the Spanish and English translations too.  So, I end up feeling like I am reading four translations during these sections.